Daqo New Energy (DQ)
Daqo New Energy PS Ratio (TTM):
0.7936 for June 21, 2017Daqo New Energy PS Ratio (TTM) Chart
Daqo New Energy Historical PS Ratio (TTM) Data
| Data for this Date Range | |
|---|---|
| June 21, 2017 | 0.7936 |
| June 20, 2017 | 0.804 |
| June 19, 2017 | 0.8094 |
| June 16, 2017 | 0.8257 |
| June 15, 2017 | 0.8056 |
| June 14, 2017 | 0.8273 |
| June 13, 2017 | 0.8803 |
| June 12, 2017 | 0.8177 |
| June 9, 2017 | 0.8311 |
| June 8, 2017 | 0.8911 |
| June 7, 2017 | 0.8494 |
| June 6, 2017 | 0.8369 |
| June 5, 2017 | 0.8432 |
| June 2, 2017 | 0.8782 |
| June 1, 2017 | 0.9003 |
| May 31, 2017 | 0.9074 |
| May 30, 2017 | 0.9095 |
| May 26, 2017 | 0.932 |
| May 25, 2017 | 0.9487 |
| May 24, 2017 | 0.9599 |
| May 23, 2017 | 0.9608 |
| May 22, 2017 | 0.9716 |
| May 19, 2017 | 0.9399 |
| May 18, 2017 | 0.9195 |
| May 17, 2017 | 0.9308 |
| May 16, 2017 | 0.9866 |
| May 15, 2017 | 0.9704 |
| May 12, 2017 | 0.9699 |
| May 11, 2017 | 0.9975 |
| May 10, 2017 | 0.982 |
| May 9, 2017 | 0.9249 |
| May 8, 2017 | 0.8219 |
| May 5, 2017 | 0.7881 |
| May 4, 2017 | 0.7723 |
| May 3, 2017 | 0.7856 |
| May 2, 2017 | 0.7815 |
| May 1, 2017 | 0.7906 |
| April 28, 2017 | 0.776 |
| April 27, 2017 | 0.7744 |
| April 26, 2017 | 0.7835 |
| April 25, 2017 | 0.7706 |
| April 24, 2017 | 0.7719 |
| April 21, 2017 | 0.7635 |
| April 20, 2017 | 0.7769 |
| April 19, 2017 | 0.7873 |
| April 18, 2017 | 0.7827 |
| April 17, 2017 | 0.7652 |
| April 13, 2017 | 0.7823 |
| April 12, 2017 | 0.7956 |
| April 11, 2017 | 0.8252 |
There is no data for the selected date range.
An error occurred. Please try again by refreshing your browser or contact us with details of your problem.
About Price to Sales Ratio
The price to sales ratio (PS ratio) is calculated by dividing stock price by the revenue per share. It is most useful for comparing companies within a sector or industry because "normal" values for this ratio vary from industry to industry. In general, low price to sales ratios are more appealing because they suggest that a company is undervalued.
An example illustrating why PS ratios should not be compared across industries: On June 21, 2010, Starbucks had a PS ratio of 1.12 while Yahoo! had a PS ratio of 2.56. In other words, Yahoo! shareholders were paying $2.56 for $1 of sales while Starbucks shareholders would only pay $1.12 for $1 of sales. However, at that same moment, the two companies' price to earnings ratios were virtually identical (Starbucks: 28.09 and Yahoo!: 27.78). Hence, shareholders were paying nearly the same amount for $1.00 in earnings. The PS ratios, though, are less comparable since Yahoo!'s profit margins are much higher than that of Starbucks.
For more information on evaluating valuation multiples similar to this, please see our original white paper research : Making Sense Of Valuation Multiples.
Learn More
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Benchmarks
| Companies | |
|---|---|
| ChinaCache Intl Hldgs | 0.1917 |
| Yingli Green Energy Hldg | 0.0348 |
| SPI Energy |
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Range, Past 5 Years
| Minimum | 0.062 | Jun 28 2012 |
| Maximum | 4.120 | Nov 13 2013 |
| Average | 1.138 |
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Excel Add-In Codes
- Metric Code: ps_ratio
- Latest data point: =YCP("DQ", "ps_ratio")
- Last 5 data points: =YCS("DQ", "ps_ratio", -4)
To find the codes for any of our financial metrics, see our Complete Reference of Metric Codes.
Access our powerful Excel Add-in with a YCharts Professional Membership. Learn More.
