Daqo New Energy (DQ)
Daqo New Energy PS Ratio (TTM):
0.9552 for Sept. 30, 2016Daqo New Energy PS Ratio (TTM) Chart
Daqo New Energy Historical PS Ratio (TTM) Data
| Data for this Date Range | |
|---|---|
| Sept. 30, 2016 | 0.9552 |
| Sept. 29, 2016 | 0.9566 |
| Sept. 28, 2016 | 1.012 |
| Sept. 27, 2016 | 0.9832 |
| Sept. 26, 2016 | 0.9453 |
| Sept. 23, 2016 | 0.9448 |
| Sept. 22, 2016 | 0.9123 |
| Sept. 21, 2016 | 0.8979 |
| Sept. 20, 2016 | 0.8997 |
| Sept. 19, 2016 | 0.9187 |
| Sept. 16, 2016 | 0.9977 |
| Sept. 15, 2016 | 1.038 |
| Sept. 14, 2016 | 1.066 |
| Sept. 13, 2016 | 1.105 |
| Sept. 12, 2016 | 1.148 |
| Sept. 9, 2016 | 1.123 |
| Sept. 8, 2016 | 1.134 |
| Sept. 7, 2016 | 1.110 |
| Sept. 6, 2016 | 1.122 |
| Sept. 2, 2016 | 1.123 |
| Sept. 1, 2016 | 1.099 |
| Aug. 31, 2016 | 1.086 |
| Aug. 30, 2016 | 1.114 |
| Aug. 29, 2016 | 1.116 |
| Aug. 26, 2016 | 1.112 |
| Aug. 25, 2016 | 1.103 |
| Aug. 24, 2016 | 1.110 |
| Aug. 23, 2016 | 1.121 |
| Aug. 22, 2016 | 1.118 |
| Aug. 19, 2016 | 1.101 |
| Aug. 18, 2016 | 1.108 |
| Aug. 17, 2016 | 1.082 |
| Aug. 16, 2016 | 1.047 |
| Aug. 15, 2016 | 1.061 |
| Aug. 12, 2016 | 1.056 |
| Aug. 11, 2016 | 1.045 |
| Aug. 10, 2016 | 1.140 |
| Aug. 9, 2016 | 1.120 |
| Aug. 8, 2016 | 1.165 |
| Aug. 5, 2016 | 1.112 |
| Aug. 4, 2016 | 1.102 |
| Aug. 3, 2016 | 1.149 |
| Aug. 2, 2016 | 1.082 |
| Aug. 1, 2016 | 1.034 |
| July 29, 2016 | 1.032 |
| July 28, 2016 | 0.9873 |
| July 27, 2016 | 0.9909 |
| July 26, 2016 | 0.9877 |
| July 25, 2016 | 1.002 |
| July 22, 2016 | 1.004 |
| July 21, 2016 | 1.002 |
There is no data for the selected date range.
An error occurred. Please try again by refreshing your browser or contact us with details of your problem.
About Price to Sales Ratio
The price to sales ratio (PS ratio) is calculated by dividing stock price by the revenue per share. It is most useful for comparing companies within a sector or industry because "normal" values for this ratio vary from industry to industry. In general, low price to sales ratios are more appealing because they suggest that a company is undervalued.
An example illustrating why PS ratios should not be compared across industries: On June 21, 2010, Starbucks had a PS ratio of 1.12 while Yahoo! had a PS ratio of 2.56. In other words, Yahoo! shareholders were paying $2.56 for $1 of sales while Starbucks shareholders would only pay $1.12 for $1 of sales. However, at that same moment, the two companies' price to earnings ratios were virtually identical (Starbucks: 28.09 and Yahoo!: 27.78). Hence, shareholders were paying nearly the same amount for $1.00 in earnings. The PS ratios, though, are less comparable since Yahoo!'s profit margins are much higher than that of Starbucks.
For more information on evaluating valuation multiples similar to this, please see our original white paper research : Making Sense Of Valuation Multiples.
Learn More
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Benchmarks
| Companies | |
|---|---|
| Apollo Solar Energy | |
| Shanghai Fudan | 3.427 |
| Yingli Green Energy Hldg | 0.0485 |
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Range, Past 5 Years
| Minimum | 0.0322 | Dec 19 2011 |
| Maximum | 6.634 | Nov 13 2013 |
| Average | 1.229 |
DQ PS Ratio (TTM) Excel Add-In Codes
- Metric Code: ps_ratio
- Latest data point: =YCP("DQ", "ps_ratio")
- Last 5 data points: =YCS("DQ", "ps_ratio", -4)
To find the codes for any of our financial metrics, see our Complete Reference of Metric Codes.
Access our powerful Excel Add-in with a YCharts Professional Membership. Learn More.