QAD (QADB)
QAD PS Ratio (TTM):
0.9037 for April 17, 2014View 4,000+ financial data types
QAD PS Ratio (TTM) Chart
QAD Historical PS Ratio (TTM) Data
Export Data Date Range:| Data for this Date Range | |
|---|---|
| April 17, 2014 | 0.9037 |
| April 16, 2014 | 0.8811 |
| April 15, 2014 | 0.8676 |
| April 14, 2014 | 0.9064 |
| April 11, 2014 | 0.9124 |
| April 10, 2014 | 0.893 |
| April 9, 2014 | 0.9064 |
| April 8, 2014 | 0.8988 |
| April 7, 2014 | 0.9091 |
| April 4, 2014 | 0.9086 |
| April 3, 2014 | 0.9361 |
| April 2, 2014 | 0.9323 |
| April 1, 2014 | 0.9284 |
| March 31, 2014 | 0.9167 |
| March 28, 2014 | 0.9339 |
| March 27, 2014 | 0.9549 |
| March 26, 2014 | 0.9539 |
| March 25, 2014 | 0.9751 |
| March 24, 2014 | 0.9695 |
| March 21, 2014 | 0.9528 |
| March 20, 2014 | 0.97 |
| March 19, 2014 | 0.97 |
| March 18, 2014 | 0.9942 |
| March 17, 2014 | 1.019 |
| March 14, 2014 | 0.9711 |
| March 13, 2014 | 0.9307 |
| March 12, 2014 | 0.9388 |
| March 11, 2014 | 0.9097 |
| March 10, 2014 | 0.9199 |
| March 7, 2014 | 0.9479 |
| March 6, 2014 | 0.9501 |
| March 5, 2014 | 0.9398 |
| March 4, 2014 | 0.9425 |
| March 3, 2014 | 0.9102 |
| Feb. 28, 2014 | 0.8957 |
| Feb. 27, 2014 | 0.9091 |
| Feb. 26, 2014 | 0.9107 |
| Feb. 25, 2014 | 0.9199 |
| Feb. 24, 2014 | 0.8919 |
| Feb. 21, 2014 | 0.9194 |
| Feb. 20, 2014 | 0.8739 |
| Feb. 19, 2014 | 0.9021 |
| Feb. 18, 2014 | 0.9102 |
| Feb. 14, 2014 | 0.8595 |
| Feb. 13, 2014 | 0.8838 |
| Feb. 12, 2014 | 0.8542 |
| Feb. 11, 2014 | 0.8655 |
| Feb. 10, 2014 | 0.8569 |
| Feb. 7, 2014 | 0.8639 |
| Feb. 6, 2014 | 0.8477 |
There is no data for the selected date range.
An error occurred. Please try again by refreshing your browser or contact us with details of your problem.
About Price to Sales Ratio
The price to sales ratio (PS ratio) is calculated by dividing stock price by the revenue per share. It is most useful for comparing companies within a sector or industry because "normal" values for this ratio vary from industry to industry. In general, low price to sales ratios are more appealing because they suggest that a company is undervalued.
An example illustrating why PS ratios should not be compared across industries: On June 21, 2010, Starbucks had a PS ratio of 1.12 while Yahoo! had a PS ratio of 2.56. In other words, Yahoo! shareholders were paying $2.56 for $1 of sales while Starbucks shareholders would only pay $1.12 for $1 of sales. However, at that same moment, the two companies' price to earnings ratios were virtually identical (Starbucks: 28.09 and Yahoo!: 27.78). Hence, shareholders were paying nearly the same amount for $1.00 in earnings. The PS ratios, though, are less comparable since Yahoo!'s profit margins are much higher than that of Starbucks.
For more information on evaluating valuation multiples similar to this, please see our original white paper research : Making Sense Of Valuation Multiples.
Learn More
QADB PS Ratio (TTM) Benchmarks
| Companies | |
|---|---|
| American Software | 2.79 |
| LogMeIn | 6.032 |
| Vasco Data Security | 2.013 |
QADB PS Ratio (TTM) Range, Past 5 Years
| Minimum | 0.6158 | Feb 9 2011 |
| Maximum | 1.120 | Dec 27 2013 |
| Average | 0.8104 |
QADB News
Business Wire 04/17 16:05 ET
Business Wire 04/15 08:03 ET
GlobeNewswire 04/14 16:05 ET
Business Wire 04/14 08:07 ET
noodls 03/20 09:58 ET
