Did you miss our Conference Call on IBM? Watch the replay here. HIDE

QC Holdings (QCCO)

Add to Watchlists Create an Alert
2.500 -0.01  -0.39% NASDAQ Jul 31, 8:00PM BATS Real time Currency in USD

QC Holdings PS Ratio (TTM):

0.2812 for July 31, 2014

View 4,000+ financial data types

View Full Chart

QC Holdings PS Ratio (TTM) Chart

Export Data
Save Image

QC Holdings Historical PS Ratio (TTM) Data

View and export this data going back to 2004. Start your YCharts Lite Membership
Export Data Date Range:
Viewing of   First  Previous First  Previous   Next  Last Next   Last
Data for this Date Range  
July 31, 2014 0.2812
July 30, 2014 0.2823
July 29, 2014 0.2733
July 28, 2014 0.289
July 25, 2014 0.2868
July 24, 2014 0.2913
July 23, 2014 0.2823
July 22, 2014 0.2722
July 21, 2014 0.2823
July 18, 2014 0.2812
July 17, 2014 0.2924
July 16, 2014 0.2924
July 15, 2014 0.3014
July 14, 2014 0.3059
July 11, 2014 0.3036
July 10, 2014 0.3036
July 9, 2014 0.2969
July 8, 2014 0.2969
July 7, 2014 0.2879
July 3, 2014 0.2969
July 2, 2014 0.3003
July 1, 2014 0.2991
June 30, 2014 0.2991
June 27, 2014 0.298
June 26, 2014 0.2935
   
June 25, 2014 0.307
June 24, 2014 0.3003
June 23, 2014 0.3003
June 20, 2014 0.2935
June 19, 2014 0.3003
June 18, 2014 0.2946
June 17, 2014 0.2945
June 16, 2014 0.3003
June 13, 2014 0.2935
June 12, 2014 0.2868
June 11, 2014 0.2969
June 10, 2014 0.3036
June 9, 2014 0.2742
June 6, 2014 0.281
June 5, 2014 0.2857
June 4, 2014 0.2564
June 3, 2014 0.2564
June 2, 2014 0.2519
May 30, 2014 0.2463
May 29, 2014 0.2542
May 28, 2014 0.239
May 27, 2014 0.2339
May 23, 2014 0.2305
May 22, 2014 0.2294
May 21, 2014 0.244

There is no data for the selected date range.

An error occurred. Please try again by refreshing your browser or contact us with details of your problem.

About Price to Sales Ratio

The price to sales ratio (PS ratio) is calculated by dividing stock price by the revenue per share. It is most useful for comparing companies within a sector or industry because "normal" values for this ratio vary from industry to industry. In general, low price to sales ratios are more appealing because they suggest that a company is undervalued.

An example illustrating why PS ratios should not be compared across industries: On June 21, 2010, Starbucks had a PS ratio of 1.12 while Yahoo! had a PS ratio of 2.56. In other words, Yahoo! shareholders were paying $2.56 for $1 of sales while Starbucks shareholders would only pay $1.12 for $1 of sales. However, at that same moment, the two companies' price to earnings ratios were virtually identical (Starbucks: 28.09 and Yahoo!: 27.78). Hence, shareholders were paying nearly the same amount for $1.00 in earnings. The PS ratios, though, are less comparable since Yahoo!'s profit margins are much higher than that of Starbucks.

For more information on evaluating valuation multiples similar to this, please see our original white paper research : Making Sense Of Valuation Multiples.
Learn More

Get data for
Advertisement

QCCO PS Ratio (TTM) Benchmarks

Companies
Astoria Financial 3.095
Jeff Davis Bancshare
Brookline Bancorp 3.205

QCCO PS Ratio (TTM) Range, Past 5 Years

Minimum 0.1839 Dec 20 2013
Maximum 0.5634 Sep 16 2009
Average 0.3597

QCCO PS Ratio (TTM) Excel Add-In Codes

  • Metric Code: ps_ratio
  • Latest data point: =YCP("QCCO", "ps_ratio")
  • Last 5 data points: =YCS("QCCO", "ps_ratio", -4)

To find the codes for any of our financial metrics, see our Complete Reference of Metric Codes.

Access our powerful Excel Add-in with a YCharts Professional Membership. Learn More.

Advertisement

Already registered? Click here to sign in.

Access watchlists and custom data alerts.
Start your free account.

required
required
required
required
required
Get Started Now
document.write('');

{{root.upsell.info.feature_headline}}.
Upgrade to {{root.upsell.info.tier_name}}. Start your {{root.upsell.info.tier_name}} Membership

{{root.upsell.info.feature_description}}

{{root.upsell.info.is_upgrade ? "Upgrade Now" : "Start My Free Trial"}}

Already a {{root.upsell.info.tier_name}} Member? Sign in here.